|
|
|
> NIH Update
3299 K Street, NW,
|
Policy Update
NIH Funding: Highlights of FY06 Labor, HHS, Education Appropriations Bill On June 24, the House of Representatives passed the appropriations bill for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies (HR 3010) by a vote of 250-151. The bill has now been referred to the Senate Committee on Appropriations, and subcommittee markups are scheduled for July 12th and full committee markups are scheduled for the 14th. The funding levels in the bill were established by the House LHHS subcommittee on June 9th. According to the bill, the National Institutes of Health would receive $28.5 billion in FY 2006, a 0.5% increase over FY 2005. The NIH had requested $28.59 billion, a $196 million or 0.7% increase. The funding levels approved by the House would be the lowest increase of funds for the NIH in more than two decades. As part of the NIH’s allocation, the NCI would receive $4.84 billion in FY 2006, a $16.5 million or 0.34% increase over the FY 2005 level. The NCI had requested 6.17 billion for 2006.
The
following links justify the NIH and NCI’s budget request and emphasize
the importance of a budget increase. IOM Looking into Post-Market Drug Safety System The Institute of Medicine recently formed an ad hoc committee at the request of the Food and Drug Administration that will assess the current post-marketing drug safety system and make recommendations for its improvement. The committee, whose project is called “Assessment of the U.S. Drug Safety System,” includes an impressive list of physicians, lawyers, statisticians, and others who are familiar with the issues surrounding drug safety. At the first meeting held on June 8, 2005, the committee heard from government, industry, and patient organizations who gave their perspectives on the current drug safety system. The second meeting of the committee will be July 19th to 21st at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, D.C. The meeting will be open to the public from 3:00-6:00pm on July 19th and will be devoted to public comments regarding post-marketing drug safety. If you would like to speak at this meeting you must sign up in advance by sending an email to drugsafety@nas.edu, including your full name, organization/affiliation, address, and phone and fax numbers. You will be allotted 5 to 8 minutes to speak. This meeting will also be open to the public on July 20th from 1:00-5:30pm. If you would like to attend the meeting but not be a presenter, you may register at www.iom.edu/drugsafety/meetingtwo. FOCR Activities FOCR to Co-Host Drug Safety Briefing on the Hill
FOCR Joins National Health Council
FOCR Announces Membership of New Scientific Advisory Board Friends of Cancer Research is excited to announce the formation of a Scientific Advisory Board composed of leading scientists and doctors from around the country. The newly formed Scientific Advisory Board will provide independent scientific advice and recommendations to the organization on issues relevant to the advancement of cancer research. Friends is honored to welcome the following individuals onto the Scientific Advisory Board - please click here for the full list. FOCR Welcomes Two New Board Members The FOCR Board of Directors recently voted to add two new board members: Lucile L. Adams-Campbell, Ph.D., Director of the Howard University Cancer Center and Nancy Davenport-Ennis, CEO of the Patient Advocate Foundation. FOCR looks forward to having their unique and valued perspectives. Dr. Adams-Campbell is currently the only African-American woman director of cancer center in the country and was the first African-American female to receive a Ph.D. in epidemiology in the country. Dr. Adams-Campbell’s research focuses on addressing health disparities in the African Diaspora, with particular emphasis on clinical trials, cancer etiology, and behavioral risk factors including exercise and nutrition. Nancy Davenport-Ennis is a cancer survivor and the Founding Executive Director of the National Patient Advocate Foundation (NPAF), a policy organization that seeks to improve access to care through regulatory and policy initiatives at the state and federal levels. Additionally, she established Patient Advocate Foundation (PAF) in 1996 as a direct patient services non-profit organization. PAF provides case managers and attorneys to resolve access, pre-authorization, coding and billing errors and assistance with expedited approvals to private and public health care programs.
This
month's spotlight features
Dr. Adams-Campbell and
another
new
board member
who was elected last December,
Barbara Duffy Stewart, Executive Director of the Association of
American Cancer Institutes. These
important figures in the cancer community
will
share their perspectives on challenges, opportunities, and priorities
in cancer research. Barbara Duffy Stewart: The cancer centers represented by AACI are centralized, integrated and inquiry driven environments that promote multidisciplinary collaborations among laboratory, clinical population and behavioral scientists across the cancer research community. These interactions have yielded the novel insights and promising strategies for treatment and early detection that have reduced cancer death rates every year since 1990 and have saved millions of lives. Clearly, the work done at our centers has been remarkable, but if progress toward a cure is to continue, a generous investment in cancer research from both the public and private sectors must be sustained. Another challenge going forward is to develop more effective strategies that will assure a steady and expanded flow of young scientists, physicians, nurses and other health professionals in to the cancer workforce. Finally, many Americans remain ill-informed about cancer, and we need to find better ways to inform the public about cancer prevention, early detection and the importance of clinical trials.
The urban cancer center perspective Dr. Lucile Adams-Campbell: As Director of a Cancer Center that serves a large minority patient population, the biggest challenge is limited resources made available to seriously address the burden of cancer. Funding for the underserved and minority populations are often distributed to well established Institutions, to address disparate issues, regardless of their track record in the targeted population. The biggest opportunity is the ability of our scientists to partner with selected majority institutions in attempting to address cancer in the minority and underserved. It is in the spirit of partnering that will ultimately lead to positive gains in addressing cancer disparities in the local and global community. Science Corner: Stem Cells For a number of years stem cell research has been a major topic of national debate. The promise of stem cell research is impressive, but what does it mean for cancer? Fundamentally, stem cell research has remarkable potential to improve the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer. The different types of stem cells are precursor cells in the body and have the ability to develop into any type of cell, from liver tissue to white blood cells. Stem cells have actually been treating cancer for 40 years through hematopoietic stem cell bone marrow transplantation and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, both of which are procedures done to restore cells destroyed by chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Theoretical stem cell cancer treatment options are vast, ranging from using stem cells to help the body’s immune system target and kill cancer cells, to growing genetically identical replacement tissue. Additionally, through the use of specifically designed stem cells, cancer patients may be able to benefit from a continuous supply of transplantable bone marrow and white blood cells. Some new treatment methods are already in the preliminary phases of research. The NIH currently lists more than 250 clinical cancer trials that involve stem cells. Stem cells can also help scientists fully understand cancer and cancer growth mechanisms, which would facilitate the development of new detection and prevention techniques. The scientific possibility also exists of isolating the precursor stem cells for many cancers and then determining the specific molecular progression of the disease. Peer-reviewed scientific evidence already indicates that stem cells provide models for the molecular and cellular genesis of cancer. Identifying and isolating cancer stem cells will help researchers determine molecular signals directing tumorigenesis as well as hand them a distinct advantage in developing targeted therapies, examining drug toxicity, and determining drug efficacy. Stem cell research is a major frontier in medicine with enormous promise, not only for cancer, but for other devastating illnesses such as heart disease, Parkinson’s, diabetes, Alzheimer’s, AIDS, paralysis, and neurodegeneration. To learn more about stem cells and stem cell research please use the following links. Links: Ø American Association for Cancer Research: Responsible Exploration of the Full Spectrum of Stem Cell Biology is Essential to the Advancement of Cancer Research http://www.aacr.org/page3262.aspx
Ø National Bone Marrow Donor
Program: A History of Stem Cell Transplants
Ø International Society for Stem
Cell Research
Ø
Stem Cell Research Foundation
Ø
National Institutes of Health Stem Cell
Information
Ø
NIH Clinical Trials searchable database
NEW!
On the FOCR Website:
The Research Resource |
To subscribe or unsubscribe email info@focr.org with subject "Newsletter."