| Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) Legislative Proposals |
|
|
|
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) Legislative Proposals CER continues to be an important componant of the health reform debate. The House and Senate both have provisions on comparative effectiveness research that are, or likely will be, included in the health reform legislation from the House and Senate, and are designed to improve medical decision-making through expansion of the federal government programs for research comparing the effectiveness of medical options. All of the proposals create a trust fund to support such research through a combination of appropriations and a per-capita fee on Medicare and private insurers. A major difference between the bills is their governance structure. The Baucus-Conrad CER proposal would establish an independent, multi-stakeholder Board to set research priorities and award grants. Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said, "Doctors and patients need reliable, unbiased information about the effectiveness of treatments to determine the best care possible, but right now that data is scarce and unorganized." The Senate HELP proposal would establish a Center for Health Outcomes Research and Evaluation to, according to the legislation, identify ways to most effectively prevent, diagnose, treat and clinically manage diseases, disorders and health conditions.
To view the Senate HELP Committees Health Reform Bill [CLICK HERE] To view the House Tri-Committee Section-by-Section Analysis (CER on pg.19) [CLICK HERE]
To view the The PatientCentered Outcomes Research Act of 2009 [CLICK HERE]
|









